The baronies of Wicklow, 1900. Click to zoom. (Source: Wikimedia Commons)
Updated:
19 September 2022 (reference to nineteenth century Irish speaking)
19 September 2022 (reference to nineteenth century Irish speaking)
15 August 2022 (Detailed information about Wicklow Irish from the Leabhar Branach, see below)
12 September 2020 (Eighteenth century Wicklow, see below)
10 January 2017 (the sounds of Wicklow Irish, see below)
The Irish of Co. Wicklow
12 September 2020 (Eighteenth century Wicklow, see below)
10 January 2017 (the sounds of Wicklow Irish, see below)
The Irish of Co. Wicklow
I was
recently contacted by two correspondents asking about the Irish dialects
historically spoken in what is now Co. Wicklow.
Wicklow,
like North Kildare, is an area of particular interest to this blog as it is
likely that the dialects spoken in Co. Wicklow – especially its northern half –
were at once quite similar to and yet appreciably different to the
(sub)dialects spoken in Co. Dublin. In particular the dialects of the far south of Co. Dublin (e.g. Glenasmole, Brittas) and the far north of Wicklow (e.g. Glencree, Powerscourt) were likely to have been substantially the same. By the same token, the Irish of South
Wicklow almost certainly shared a great many features with the Irish of North Wexford, whilst that of West Wicklow probably shaded gradually into the Irish
once spoken in South Kildare and Carlow.
Here, we will
take a brief look at the decline of Irish in Wicklow and then discuss some of
its key features.
How did
Irish die out in Wicklow?
Elsewhere
on this blog it was pointed out that Irish seems, rather inexplicably, to have
retreated more quickly in Wicklow and parts of Wexford, Laois, Kildare and Carlow than in
parts of Co. Dublin. Even the well-known dialect investigator Donn Piatt, who is very much given to maximising (or
even exaggerating) the potential survival of pockets of traditional Irish in
his 1933 booklet The Gaelic
Dialects of Leinster strikes an
uncharacteristic note of caution when it comes to parts of Co. Wicklow, viz.:
Until a very recent date, some in the county spoke Irish, but the mines of Tigroney, near Avoca, and the Glendalough mines caused a strong immigration from surrounding counties, and it must be remembered that districts such as North Kilkenny, North Wexford, South Dublin, and quite near, were intensely Irish-speaking [sic!] at O'Donovan's time [i.e. the Ordnance Survey Letters], a century ago. This creates the absolute need of verification of the origin of every old man or woman in Wicklow claiming to have known Irish, dating 1830, 1848, etc. (p. 10)
Wicklow seems nevertheless to have been the first county to lose its
Irish: Fitzgerald’s 1983 study of minimum levels of Irish speaking at the
barony level – extrapolated backwards from levels of Irish speaking recorded
amongst the oldest age groups in the 1881, 1861 and 1851 censuses – states that
as little as one per cent of the Wicklow population born in 1771-1781 and 1801-1811 may have been Irish
speaking (although the unreliable nature of the data, with many not wanting to return themselves as Irish speakers, means the actual proportion may have
been a little – although not much – higher).
Eighteenth century Wicklow
Like most of
Ireland, Wicklow was predominantly monolingually Irish for centuries. That
Wicklow was the first county to lose its Irish almost entirely – apparently
during the eighteenth century – should not obscure the fact that this process
happened gradually in Wicklow, just as it did everywhere else in Ireland. The demographic
retreat of the Irish language in Wicklow – as in every other county – would
have resembled a receding tide, with stranded remnants of Irish-speaking communities
in remote and mountainous areas before they too, in time, ultimately succumbed to English as well.
In this context, it is illuminating to consider a description of Wicklow sketched in the curious piece The Pretender’s Exercise (1727), quoted in Bliss' highly recommended Spoken English in Ireland 1600-1740 (1979: 159-161). The Pretender's Exercise is a Trinity College-produced propaganda piece which portrays Irish-speaking conscripts in the Jacobite Army abroad being drilled in pidgin English by an officer who is clearly meant to be a native speaker of Irish just like them. One recuit is from Glenmalure, and this conscript’s dialogue with the officer is based upon criticism of the conscript’s poor English (the butt of the joke apparently being that the officer’s English is just as bad).
Question. Fat Name upon you dere?
Answer. My Name Byrn.
Quest. Fer vash yo[u] Born?
Ans. County of Killamountains.
[Quest.] De Tivil take you, can’t you call him Countys of Wicklows? I make English upon you, you make English upon me again, and be hang’d you Tief. Fere dere?
Ans. Glanmalora. It ish a good Plashe, a bad Name, all von for dat.
Quest. Fat Relishion?
Ans. A Roman Catalick.
[Sergeant.] Very vell. To de Right, put in your Toe, put out your Heel, shit ub strait!
While the intent of The Pretender’s Exercise is mockery, the piece nevertheless shows genuine first hand knowledge of Irish (grammatical constructions, idioms, Killamountains < Cill Mhantáin) and of the area (its seditious reputation; the local surname Byrne) and is thus a
plausible insight into the sociolinguistics of at least part of Wicklow
c. 1720-1730: it confirms that Glenmalure was an Irish-speaking area; that
people from Glenmalure at that time had particularly poor English, perhaps indicating that English had
yet to make serious inroads there; and that it is thus likely Irish persisted
in Glenmalure for at least a couple of generations after 1730 (if a generation
is thirty years, and the recruit was a teenager, we can surmise that Irish
continued to be spoken in Glenmalure at least until 1775 at the very earliest).
This actually matches very closely the dates from Glenmalure and Derrybawn described
below.
Looking towards Glenmalure. (Wikimedia Commons)
Wicklow was nevertheless undoubtedly the county in
Ireland with the lowest proportion of Irish speakers by the nineteenth century. By 1831-1841, this
proportion was even less than one per cent and Irish must have stopped being
passed on at all (the figures for Kildare and Wexford are not very much higher;
by contrast, in Dublin at least seven per cent of the 1771-1781-born cohort was
Irish speaking, and even two per cent of the 1861-1871-born cohort in Dublin was Irish speaking, although some of this latter cohort must have been the children of Irish speakers from elsewhere).
This to some extent matches the otherwise exaggerated observations of
the Statistical Survey of Wicklow (1801),
namely: ‘It is very remarkable, that although the Irish language is common in
all the counties around, in the county of Wicklow the Irish language is unknown.
Nor did I find any of the natives of this county, even in the most remote vales
in the midst of the mountains, accustomed to speak the Irish language’ (see Ó
Cuív 1951: 81). The Irish language was certainly not ‘unknown’ in Wicklow, and
it was scarcely likely that it was ‘unknown’ ‘even in the remote vales in the
midst of the mountains’ given that O’Donovan on his Ordnance Survey travels encountered
‘[a] few old people who [spoke] Irish’ in Kilcommon parish (Arklow barony) nearly
forty years later in 1839.
(I recently found a curious but plausible source [Wolf 2014: 156] stating that courts in Wicklow still felt it necessary to employ interpreters in 1807. There are two main possibilities here: either 1) there were a sufficient number of local monoglots, or more likely persons weak in English, in the extreme south of Wicklow in 1807 in order to justify such an otherwise avoidable expense; or 2) interpreters were felt to be necessary due to sufficient demand from monoglot migrants to mining areas. It is even possible that a third possibility, namely that there was sufficient demand for interpreters due to both local Irish speakers - presumably elderly people who spoke better Irish than English, but were not monoglots - and migrants.)
What is certain, though, is that compared to neighbouring counties in the early nineteenth century, Wicklow was the most
English-speaking (and the least Irish-speaking) of them all; that pockets of
Irish were almost impossible to find, and that there were very, very few Irish
speakers – including bilinguals – left in the county, even before the Famine.
Nineteenth century survivals and semi-speakers
Nevertheless, isolated speakers (or in some cases semi-speakers) could still be found in Wicklow well into the nineteenth century. Piatt (1933: 6) reports that ‘Andrew and Hanna Byrne of Glenealy, who both died in 1830, are the last absolutely authentic native speakers I can find in that area’ and claims the grandmother of a Mr John Byrne of Cloneen ‘dead about the Famine period, knew Irish’ (ibid, p. 2) – probably a semi-speaker. A grandson of Irish-speaking Connacht immigrants to Glenmalure told Piatt that Irish was still spoken in that area when his father, who died in 1884, was a boy, i.e. around 1810.
In his
masterpiece Labhrann
Laighnigh (2011, p. 140-141), Ó hÓgáin relates
an 1875 report of a ‘carman from Wicklow, a Mr Murphy of Derrybane [i.e.
Derrybawn] near the Seven Churches’ who ‘[u]pon being asked whether there was
any Gaelic or Irish spoken by the people in the surrounding valleys, he said
no, but that he himself had when young learned [some] rhymes from his
grandmother, which he supposed was Irish, for he did not understand one word of
it.’ Again, Mr Murphy’s grandmother sounds like a semi-speaker, and it thus seems Irish
had actually disappeared as the community language of Derrybawn during her parents’ generation, around 1795. All these examples broadly match
Fitzgerald’s data above.
Glenmalure, Co. Wicklow (Wikimedia Commons)
At
an even more local level, Fitzgerald (2003) further extrapolated Famine-era
Irish-speaking by working backwards from the 1911 census returns: by looking at
the proportion of those aged over 60 years in 1911 who returned themselves as
Irish speaking, Fitzgerald calculated the relative strength of Irish at the
district electoral division (DED) level circa 1851: i.e. if five per cent of
those over 60 years of age said they spoke Irish in 1911, it would be
reasonable to assume that that DED was at the very least five per cent
Irish-speaking sixty years previously.
In
Co. Wicklow, Fitzgerald could identify only two DEDs in which a proportion of those
aged 60+ in 1911 spoke Irish and where Irish had thus possibly been a community
language at the time of the Famine: Kilpipe,
where five per cent of those over 60 in 1911 were returned as Irish-speaking,
and Aughrim, where three per cent of
those aged over 60 were Irish-speaking in 1911. Both of these are in the south
of the county: indeed, Aughrim (the northernmost of the two) and Kilpipe (to the
south) are scarcely 5km apart, and lie roughly 5km north of the Wicklow-Wexford
county border in the barony of Ballinacor South (see map above).
Unfortunately,
Fitzgerald’s methodology in this instance seems mildly compromised by precisely
the concerns raised by Piatt in 1933: namely that Fitzgerald apparently did not
check the counties of origin of those aged 60+ in 1911. Specifically, in the
Kilpipe DED, one of the three elderly Irish speakers – Moses Doyle (72 years)
of Toberpatrick – is recorded as originally being from Co. Wexford. (The same methodological
flaw also means, for example, that Fitzgerald overstates the Famine-era status of Irish in North
Kildare and the Meath-Kildare border.)
Of
course, Mr Doyle’s parents may have been from Wicklow; but a cross-check of counties
of origin is necessary to prevent Irish speaking migrants to Wicklow, of which there were many, skewing the already extremely
low levels of statistical Irish speaking in the county in 1901 and 1911 – as Piatt
rightly warned.
Interestingly,
of Aughrim Piatt writes – based on local knowledge passed to him – that ‘[i]n
the Aughrim area Irish seems to have lasted nearly to the Famine’ (1933: 7), raising
the question of whether Piatt, unusually, was actually under-estimating rather than
exaggerating the survival of Irish in an area. In any case, any Aughrim ‘speakers’
in 1911 may only have had memories of semi-speaker Irish (i.e. they were not
fluent themselves, and neither had their parents been).
Nevertheless, the available evidence strongly suggests that Irish survived longest and strongest in a broad area west of Avoca, as that is where most mentions of Irish survivals and last speakers (and semi-speakers) in Wicklow cluster.
In the north of Wicklow, the last place where Irish was spoken natively may have been Glencree, directly adjacent to the last Irish-speaking area of South Co. Dublin, Glenasmole. Piatt (1933: 6) reports that around 1900 ‘people in the hills near Glencree knowing a little Irish, prayers, snatches of songs, etc., but not fluent’ implying a situation remarkably like that of Derrybawn in 1875. We may therefore assume a similar four-generation time span and that Irish had died out around Glencree circa 1820 at the latest.
Nevertheless, the available evidence strongly suggests that Irish survived longest and strongest in a broad area west of Avoca, as that is where most mentions of Irish survivals and last speakers (and semi-speakers) in Wicklow cluster.
In the north of Wicklow, the last place where Irish was spoken natively may have been Glencree, directly adjacent to the last Irish-speaking area of South Co. Dublin, Glenasmole. Piatt (1933: 6) reports that around 1900 ‘people in the hills near Glencree knowing a little Irish, prayers, snatches of songs, etc., but not fluent’ implying a situation remarkably like that of Derrybawn in 1875. We may therefore assume a similar four-generation time span and that Irish had died out around Glencree circa 1820 at the latest.
Art's Lough, Co. Wicklow. (Wikimedia Commons)
Claimed (improbable) monolinguals, 1901
The 1901 census records 18 Wicklow-born people from Co. Wicklow returned
themselves as speaking only Irish. Of these, seven were over 50 years of age:
four belonged to one household (the Merrigans of Laragh West, Brockagh) and two
to another (the Lynches of Ballinroan Lower, Eadestown). It is extremely
unlikely these people actually were monolingual
in Irish, although they may have known some Irish.
Claimed bilinguals,
1901
In 1901, there were 273 Wicklow-born people returned from Co. Wicklow as
speaking both Irish and English. Of
these, 29 were 50 years of age or over (cf: Fitzgerald’s methodology above). These
29 Irish speakers were however scattered throughout 16 DEDs: four belonged to
one household alone (the Coogans of Clogh Upper, Baltinglass, where all were
returned as speaking both Irish and English) and three to another (the Butlers
of Ballard, Ballinaclash, similarly all returned as speaking both languages).
Four
other older bilinguals were recorded living separately from one another in
Bray; at least one of whom – Daniel Butler (aged 60, a grocer) – is stated as
having been born locally (in Callary). Luke Cuddy (aged 50), returned as a
bilingual, is recorded in Brockagh about a kilometre away from the Merrigan
household mentioned above.
Two Byrnes (a John Byrne aged 60 in Bray
and a second John Byrne aged 71 in Drumgoff, Ballinacor) and one Toole (aged
80, Ashford) were the only specifically Wicklow surnames among the 29 oldest bilinguals.
Merrigan is perhaps also a Wicklow surname.
Claimed bilinguals,
1911
A decade later, in the 1911 census, 571 Wicklow-born people returned themselves
as bilingual in both Irish and English. Of these, 15 were 60 years of age or over
(and hence belonging to the Famine generation) yet only two individuals – Joseph
John Lambert of Tinnakilly Upper, Aughrim (returned as 49 in 1901, but 62 in
1911!) and Bridget Nolan of Bray (aged 65 in 1901, 78 in 1911) – were recorded
as knowing Irish in both censuses.
None of those who returned themselves as Irish-speaking
monolinguals in Wicklow in 1901 returned themselves as monolinguals in 1911. It is clear both the 1901 and 1911 census data was characterised predominantly by revival Irish.
Glenmalure, Co. Wicklow (Wikimedia Commons)
So, what did Wicklow Irish actually sound like?
As with the Irish of all other counties, it is extremely unlikely that the Irish of Co. Wicklow was a single homogeneous dialect: the Irish of South Wicklow would have had similarities with the Irish of Wexford and Carlow; the Irish of North Wicklow with the adjacent dialects spoken in South Co. Dublin and North Kildare; and the Irish of Mid- and West Wicklow most likely shared features with neighbouring dialects in South Kildare.
Nevertheless, we can from a number of sources identify some general yet key features of the Irish dialect(s) of Co. Wicklow. A great many of these come to light through spelling mistakes in texts in Irish written in Wicklow whilst Irish was still the spoken language of the area, which reveal the pronunciation of the writer (primarily the Leabhar Branach or Book of the O'Byrnes, a book of poems composed in Glenmalure between c. 1550 and 1630); secondly, other idiosyncrasies of local pronunciation have been preserved in place-names (the place-names of Wicklow were painstakingly studied by the late Dr. Liam Price until his death in 1967); lastly, we can infer a great deal about the dialect(s) in question from the few Irish words that have survived in the Hiberno-English of Wicklow, primarily collated by the late Diarmuid Ó Muirithe.
The sounds of Wicklow Irish
-adh, -amh and -abh
As in South Dublin and Offaly (at the very least), the endings -adh, -amh and -abh in e.g. déanamh 'do', talamh 'land' etc. were invariably pronounced the same throughout Wicklow, namely as -a (i.e. most likely as a schwa sound like the -a in Eng. sofa). This is perhaps the most quintessentially Leinster feature of the Wicklow dialect (and of the dialects of South Dublin and Offaly, and probably Kildare too); the rule elsewhere in Ireland is to differentiate between -adh, -amh and -abh. Very generally, north of this area these are pronounced -ú (as in Ulster, although this feature was the norm at least as far south as Athlone, Longford Town and South Meath), and southeast of it -amh is pronounced -av, -adh (in nouns) as -a, and -adh (in the past tense) as -ag (as in Ossory and Munster). The Leinster dialect, of which the Wicklow dialect was a central member, was thus particularly distinct in this regard.
-igh, -aigh
As in the rest of Old Leinster, -igh was probably pronounced -e and -aigh was probably pronounced -a in Wicklow. I strongly suspect that in Wicklow (as in Dublin as far as I can tell) these two sounds had in fact fallen even further together as a schwa sound i.e. [ə] identical to -a above. This leads to the extraordinary situation of -adh, -amh, -abh, -igh and -aigh all having been pronounced as a neutral vowel (i.e. as -a in Eng. sofa) in Old Leinster (including Wicklow). How this may have affected comprehension I cannot say.
-cn, gn
Three-quarters of Ireland habitually pronounce(d) initial cn- and gn- in words such cnoc 'hill' and gnóthach 'busy' as if cr- and gr- respectively; this change took place in the Middle Ages (Williams dates it to before the thirteenth century). Almost everywhere north of a line from Clare (where both forms were used) to South Kilkenny, cr- was (and continues to be) the norm; south of this line, i.e. in parts of Clare, West Kilkenny and all of Munster, cn- and gn- remained cn-. Wicklow was no exception to this rule and throughout the region cn- and gn- were nearly always cr- and gr-, disagreeing with Munster but agreeing with all other dialects.
ao
This spelling, in e.g. gaoth 'wind', is generally pronounced either [i:] i.e. í in Connacht, [ɯ] i.e. a close back unrounded vowel in parts of Donegal (and historically throughout most of Ulster and Louth), or as [e:] i.e. é in Munster and Ossory. In Wicklow (and South Dublin) ao was probably pronounced [e:] i.e. é with Wicklow (and Old Leinster) disagreeing with Connacht and Ulster but agreeing with Munster in this regard, e.g gaoth > gaéh.
-ch, -cht
Neilson (1808), in his introductory grammar on Irish, claimed that 'ch, before t, is quite silent in all the country along the sea coast, from Derry to Waterford' - presumably thereby including the coast of Wicklow. O'Rahilly, in his masterpiece Irish Dialects Past and Present (1932: 112) also states that -ch was silent in (presumably the coastal part of) Wicklow right up to the eighteenth century. There is, however, no conclusive evidence of this that I have seen; on the contrary, there is persuasive evidence that in Wicklow both -ch and -cht were fully pronounced in all positions, as they were in all of the country outside Ulster and Louth. The question is more one of whether -th was pronounced as -ch, as in parts of Wexford and Ossory.
-bh-, -mh-
In the Leabhar Branach medial -bh- and -mh- are typically deleted and the preceding vowel lengthened, so that e.g. leabhar 'book' > leár. In so doing Wicklow concurs with Ossory and Munster and disagrees with Connacht and Ulster.
cad
We can confidently assign Wicklow in its entirety to the zone that used g- interrogatives (i.e. goid~gad < cad), as Labhrann Laighnigh (p. 170) records the mixed form Goidé an chaoi athá tú from Carlow, to the south east of Wicklow. Wicklow was thus surrounded to its west and north (Dublin also used goid and gad; see Labhrann Laighnigh p. 26-27) by g-forms and it is thus highly likely that Wicklow used them too, meaning the isogloss ran fairly cleanly from Tobercurry, Sligo (LASID pt. 61) to the Barrow. North Kilkenny (LASID pt. 6) also has goidé.
Detailed information about Wicklow Irish from the Leabhar Branach
Nevertheless, we can from a number of sources identify some general yet key features of the Irish dialect(s) of Co. Wicklow. A great many of these come to light through spelling mistakes in texts in Irish written in Wicklow whilst Irish was still the spoken language of the area, which reveal the pronunciation of the writer (primarily the Leabhar Branach or Book of the O'Byrnes, a book of poems composed in Glenmalure between c. 1550 and 1630); secondly, other idiosyncrasies of local pronunciation have been preserved in place-names (the place-names of Wicklow were painstakingly studied by the late Dr. Liam Price until his death in 1967); lastly, we can infer a great deal about the dialect(s) in question from the few Irish words that have survived in the Hiberno-English of Wicklow, primarily collated by the late Diarmuid Ó Muirithe.
The sounds of Wicklow Irish
-adh, -amh and -abh
As in South Dublin and Offaly (at the very least), the endings -adh, -amh and -abh in e.g. déanamh 'do', talamh 'land' etc. were invariably pronounced the same throughout Wicklow, namely as -a (i.e. most likely as a schwa sound like the -a in Eng. sofa). This is perhaps the most quintessentially Leinster feature of the Wicklow dialect (and of the dialects of South Dublin and Offaly, and probably Kildare too); the rule elsewhere in Ireland is to differentiate between -adh, -amh and -abh. Very generally, north of this area these are pronounced -ú (as in Ulster, although this feature was the norm at least as far south as Athlone, Longford Town and South Meath), and southeast of it -amh is pronounced -av, -adh (in nouns) as -a, and -adh (in the past tense) as -ag (as in Ossory and Munster). The Leinster dialect, of which the Wicklow dialect was a central member, was thus particularly distinct in this regard.
-igh, -aigh
As in the rest of Old Leinster, -igh was probably pronounced -e and -aigh was probably pronounced -a in Wicklow. I strongly suspect that in Wicklow (as in Dublin as far as I can tell) these two sounds had in fact fallen even further together as a schwa sound i.e. [ə] identical to -a above. This leads to the extraordinary situation of -adh, -amh, -abh, -igh and -aigh all having been pronounced as a neutral vowel (i.e. as -a in Eng. sofa) in Old Leinster (including Wicklow). How this may have affected comprehension I cannot say.
-cn, gn
Three-quarters of Ireland habitually pronounce(d) initial cn- and gn- in words such cnoc 'hill' and gnóthach 'busy' as if cr- and gr- respectively; this change took place in the Middle Ages (Williams dates it to before the thirteenth century). Almost everywhere north of a line from Clare (where both forms were used) to South Kilkenny, cr- was (and continues to be) the norm; south of this line, i.e. in parts of Clare, West Kilkenny and all of Munster, cn- and gn- remained cn-. Wicklow was no exception to this rule and throughout the region cn- and gn- were nearly always cr- and gr-, disagreeing with Munster but agreeing with all other dialects.
ao
This spelling, in e.g. gaoth 'wind', is generally pronounced either [i:] i.e. í in Connacht, [ɯ] i.e. a close back unrounded vowel in parts of Donegal (and historically throughout most of Ulster and Louth), or as [e:] i.e. é in Munster and Ossory. In Wicklow (and South Dublin) ao was probably pronounced [e:] i.e. é with Wicklow (and Old Leinster) disagreeing with Connacht and Ulster but agreeing with Munster in this regard, e.g gaoth > gaéh.
-ch, -cht
Neilson (1808), in his introductory grammar on Irish, claimed that 'ch, before t, is quite silent in all the country along the sea coast, from Derry to Waterford' - presumably thereby including the coast of Wicklow. O'Rahilly, in his masterpiece Irish Dialects Past and Present (1932: 112) also states that -ch was silent in (presumably the coastal part of) Wicklow right up to the eighteenth century. There is, however, no conclusive evidence of this that I have seen; on the contrary, there is persuasive evidence that in Wicklow both -ch and -cht were fully pronounced in all positions, as they were in all of the country outside Ulster and Louth. The question is more one of whether -th was pronounced as -ch, as in parts of Wexford and Ossory.
-bh-, -mh-
In the Leabhar Branach medial -bh- and -mh- are typically deleted and the preceding vowel lengthened, so that e.g. leabhar 'book' > leár. In so doing Wicklow concurs with Ossory and Munster and disagrees with Connacht and Ulster.
cad
We can confidently assign Wicklow in its entirety to the zone that used g- interrogatives (i.e. goid~gad < cad), as Labhrann Laighnigh (p. 170) records the mixed form Goidé an chaoi athá tú from Carlow, to the south east of Wicklow. Wicklow was thus surrounded to its west and north (Dublin also used goid and gad; see Labhrann Laighnigh p. 26-27) by g-forms and it is thus highly likely that Wicklow used them too, meaning the isogloss ran fairly cleanly from Tobercurry, Sligo (LASID pt. 61) to the Barrow. North Kilkenny (LASID pt. 6) also has goidé.
Detailed information about Wicklow Irish from the Leabhar Branach
The Leabhar Branach ('the Book of the O'Byrnes') is a collection of poems addressed to the chieftains of the O'Byrne family of Co. Wicklow during the period 1550-1630. Seán Mac Airt (1918-1959) published these poems for the first time while at the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies. Mac Airt's work deserves great praise for the thoroughness and meticulousness of its annotations, and for its breadth, which affords us a detailed look into the Gaelic social life and culture of Wicklow in the second half of the sixteenth century and the first half of the seventeenth century - and, most importantly for this blog, into the Wicklow dialect of Irish. (I urge anyone interested to purchase a copy of the Leabhar Branach directly from DIAS here - you will not be disappointed.)
What is of particular interest linguistically in Mac Airt's masterpiece is the (unfortunately) very short appendix in which Mac Airt - inspired by O'Rahilly - summarises the key features of the local dialect used in the poems, using the traditional (and highly productive) Irish dialectological method of textual analysis in which spelling mistakes and grammatical errors inadvertently reveal the speech norms of the writer.
As this appendix is so short and its content is so relevant to the content of this blog, after some years of prevaricating I have decided to post screenshots of the summary. I hope those of you who are interested find it useful. Please note that these images were taken with a mobile phone camera and not a scanner, so the quality is necessarily (very) low; put simply, buy the book if you want better quality!
Appendix C. Mac Airt, Seán (ed.) Leabhar Branach: The Book of the O'Byrnes.
Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1944.
Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1944.
